AMD in 2005: Coming Out of Intel's Shadow?

            




<<Previous Page

Looking Forward

In 2004, AMD released a series of microprocessors for corporate users. It introduced new manufacturing techniques and pushed aggressively a new technology, which put several microprocessors on a single chip.

AMD also planned to be among the first to introduce dual-core processors for servers and desktops. These chips would have two processors engraved into one chip, for better performance. Although Intel was planning to launch its dual-core processor line by the end of 2005, AMD's engineers were optimistic about getting to the market much before their larger rival did.

Ruiz had created new business divisions within AMD that would focus on incorporating chips in cell phones and consumer electronics. A marketing push with ads in the Wall Street Journal and other eminent newspapers had also been kicked off.

Business Strategy Case Studies | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Strategy, Case Studies

or
Business Strategy Case Studies | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Strategy, Case Studies

or
PayPal (11 USD)

In early 2005, AMD announced that its new chip, Turion 64, would be available in notebooks by June 2005, to compete with Intel's Centrino and Transmeta's Astro. AMD believed that Turion would usher in a new era in mobile computing. Turion 64 mobile targeted highly mobile business professionals and consumers who demanded reliable, high-performance notebook PCs with long battery life, outstanding wireless compatibility, rich graphics and enhanced security.

One AMD official commented ,
"AMD Turion 64 mobile technology represents freedom and mobile performance personified. We expect this new product family will set a precedent for mobile PCs in the same way that AMD Opteron did for servers".

In 2004, AMD gained about one percentage point of the microprocessor market, bringing its share to 15.8% . AMD was expected to book a record $5.1 billion in full-year sales as well. The stock, at $21.73 by December 2004, had doubled in value since September 2004. AMD had laid out ambitious plans for its future, 10% of the low-end server market by the end of 2004, 30% of the corporate PC market and 50% of the consumer PC market by 2009. not withstanding these ambitious plans, AMD realized Intel could not be underestimated. In 1999, AMD had been at the cutting edge, having unveiled Athlon, which was faster than Intel's comparable processor at the time. Then, Intel had caught up and eventually leapfrogged AMD in processor performance. AMD started losing money.

Intel was not the only threat to AMD. South Korea's Samsung Electronics had been spending heavily on chip-factory equipment and manufacturing capabilities. Texas Instruments, which competed against Intel in cellular phone chips, was at work on a $3 billion advanced factory of its own.

For AMD, 2004 had been a good year. The company had gained market share from Intel and seen its stock price and cash reserves go up. But 2005 had begun on a bad note. On January 10, the company announced that earnings from the fourth quarter of 2004 would be much below Wall Street's expectations. As soon as this announcement came, AMD's stock price tumbled 25% to about $14 from about $ 25 at the end of 2004 (See Exhibit 3).

AMD had to lower its earning because Intel reduced its flash memory chip prices. Intel earned only about 7% of its total revenues from this segment, whereas AMD earned about 50% of its revenues from flash memory chips. Shortly after AMD announced weak earnings, Intel indicated strong fourth quarter 2004 earnings. This further hurt AMD's stock.

Ruiz believed that his company's flash memory performance was "freaking dismal" . He also indicated he was strengthening AMD's flash memory business. AMD lost $30 million on sales of $1.26 billion in the last quarter of 2004. This happened despite processor sales rising 26 per cent over the corresponding period in 2003.

"It was an underwhelming end to an otherwise great year".

- Ruiz

Next Page>>

Advertisement...

top